20-10 - speaking for yourself - now (when recognized)
Laetitia shared -
✨ The 20-10 : being awake is about speaking for yourself in the now… when recognized ✨
“The 20-10 people have a thing about this channel. It's one of the so called mystical channels. It's called channel of awakening, after all.
The interesting thing about the channel of awakening is that the channel of awakening is a projected channel.
It's a projected channel, someone has to recognize you're awake. Oh, yes, I mean, that's the whole thing. Someone has to recognize you’re awake. It’s not about you thinking you're awake.
The 20-10 can only do one thing. It can only speak for itself. That's what the 20-10 does. It speaks for itself, the self, the behavior in the 10 connected to the throat the 20 it speaks for itself, but there's no motor. It's projected.
When somebody says to you, “are you awake?” And that can answer “yes”, then you are. It has to be recognized by the other.
If you say to somebody, “you're awake”, they look at you and say, well, [here he made a 🤷🏻♀️ sound], it has no power. You haven't been invited, and if nobody recognizes you're awake and you're awake, you suffer from bitterness. You want everybody to know that you're awake.
You want everybody to know that you speak for yourself in the now, that's what being awake is, speaking for yourself in the now. But it has to be recognized by the other.
20-10s are verbal gunslingers. They can always shoot off their mouth. They can always speak for themselves in the now. And what seems to be the possibility of being awake, turns out to be sleepers, boring.
Everybody constantly speaking about themselves, for themselves in the now, without being recognized, without being invited, and it doesn't matter whether that ultimately is going to be connected to a motor. [both last paragraphs describe the not-self]
Please understand each channel has its own process, regardless of the definition, each channel will only operate at its best when it is responding to its type. If somebody has a motor connected to this and they can just burst that out.”
“It's to understand that in order for that awakeness to be confirmed in the being. After all, most 20-10s are not enlightened, you know. And of course, the whole thing about the integration, is that these are people that have a very, very profound capacity for survival.
This is a this is a verbal gate. It is a gate of being able to express oneself, so the awakeness is recognized, but through the speaking.
So somebody has to talk to this person. Now, you talk to them, you invite them to reveal their “I speak for myself”, and when they speak for themselves, if that speaking for themselves is clear, that other person is not necessarily going to say “he's lying” or whatever, is that they are going to feel that there is something clear, something awake in that expression. And that's the impact of the 2010 having it recognized.
You know, everybody needs to learn how to survive from integration, and that survival is made up of different parts.
How one expresses one self, how one speaks for oneself, is a key for others to see whether you are pure, not because if you are pure, you influence them. That's the process. That's why so many gurus sit there and wait for people to ask them questions, you know, so that their awakeness can be recognized.”
Q :So the invitation concern for speaking?
A : yes, oh, absolutely, it is a verbal gate. “I am myself now”. “I am speaking for myself”.
“it's the channel of being “awake” and not “enlightened”.”
“enlightenment is only one side of a coin. The other side is being dark. That’s true. You know, for me, the one who's walking around feeling good that they're enlightened, I know that there's something really wrong with them, because it’s only one side of the coin”
| do you need to know Hu with that weird verbiage?
| source - The 7 creative channels (1998)
| pic by Marek Studzinski
✏️ you may notice the insistance that this is a verbal gate… I keep seeing people talking about non-throat channels as if they’re verbal, missing the crucial filter the centers give us, when so much of our bodygraph is not at all about verbalizing things, otherwise, they’d be directly linked to the throat.