[Playshop Registration] Recognizing Recognition | We are a Synthesis
I’ve been slowly adding folks to the roster of an upcoming (likely September) Playshop that’s formulating in my awareness.
It’s called Recognizing Recognition.
Of course I can’t plan it completely (there are parts of my Design that preclude that - and yet, we carry on 🙃😊☺️) but I do have some details to share.
This is actually a prequel to the HD Mission Statement 2.0 that’s also on the percolation burner (and has been for several months - I realized there was a foundation piece to set first)
Details about what I could see was missing and how to register are here if you’d like to drink those in:
Recognizing Recognition (details):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YVzQlAkesqY5CXjQ7JZZkOyYORcuVdjFarF09VRCyuM/edit?usp=sharing
Meanwhile, there’s something from Ra that’s relevant to this conversation (added below).
You see, there’s an idea that’s pressed forward in certain spaces and can be taken maybe too literally and it goes something like this -
‘If you’re not being recognized for the definition in your chart - you’re not being recognized’ [greatly paraphrased but that’s the message that’s being delivered - and parroted by the followers]
I think Ra did say something once in that direction (I know he did), but I also think he said lots of things once, in rooms of certain people he was there to impact in particular ways.
Doesn’t make it not true or irrelevant, I just think it’s not the whole story - it’s a beginning, but then there’s more to it, and when particular snippets of Ra are used to press people in a certain way, rather than being in experiment and witnessing what we’re able to witness personally, I think this is where dogma is born.
And dogma is anything but differentiated.
My personal experience is that recognition is available through the white/open/undefined parts of our Design as well.
And this Ra passage begins to nod at that, though it’s still focusing on the Notself aspects.
It’s a start.
If the white parts of our chart are the places we “go to school” and become wise - surely there’s also recognition potential there too, yeah?
It only makes sense to me that that would be true and I have this experience in my own life.
What Ra said about being recognized for our definition was appropriate in the space he was saying it in.
It’s the sharing of particular passages, curated mostly by 5/1 heretics who naturally are universalizing what they find are the most important things (or they can have to face burning at the stake and reputations that can suffer) - that then become dogmatic … THAT’s where I see an awareness twist that has to be inserted into the foundation setting.
Definition recognition is simply not the whole story.
Now here’s Ra -
“Even though the defined parts in your chart are you and the undefined are not you in the sense that you take in energy from others via the open places in your chart, keep in mind
that who you are overall is a synthesis of both.
You might have a defined throat and that certainly is who you are.
And if you have an open root that is where you take in the "Not Self" stress of other people's root energy, i.e. you can be pulled away from the truth of your defined throat through stress.
So in that sense, the open root can be who you are not because it is where elements that aren't you can be put inside you, like an open door for strangers.
But [still] that is definitely you.
You would be a person who is vulnerable to external stress that pulls you away from the truth of your defined throat."
Let me know whether you’re interested in registering for the Playshop?
Again, it’s called ‘Recognizing Recognition’.
I think it’s gonna pop some big lightbulbs … or at least unexpected ones 🥰🤗❤️
As per usual thanks to my dear Incarnation Cross 🥳🙂
.