Di Vin (1/3 MG) shared this on FB after having apparently vetted this Robert Kennedy Jr link -

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/

• that I shared to her a couple days ago on another thread of hers.

I found it via the Rubin Report locals community (and did my own investigation before sharing it on) - I bet that person is also an investigator 🙃😊

#firstlinelifebelike …

It’s kind of interesting to consider the relationship between the 1st line and the 4th line … we can see from above example that the 1st line has a sort of a network flavor all its own… one that feels like a vetted information network. 🤔

Another interesting thing I’m noticing is that energy levels for investigation seem to vary - maybe by type - Di has WAY more energy than I do to gather and sift through all the details.

Pre-experiment me I think would have held some bitterness around that. Now I really simply appreciate all of her work and efforts.

At the end of this post is what I unexpectedly got to comment on her post (pulled from my Right Mind) - without having to do all the extra work plus so much room for her to respond to the people who arrived with her extensive investigations.

The attached image is me and Aleda texting just a few minutes ago … she’s a 3/5 MG … ie. plenty of energy thru 3rd line skepticism and 5th line heretical lens. Maybe I recognized that early :)

I can hear her little 6yo self now post-lesson about commercials “Mom, they’re just trying to sell me something!” 🤩

This is the original post /Kennedy article text (haven’t checked that it’s the full text) with my comment below that…. copying it here for convenience and in case the FB post doesn’t survive the ‘fact checkers’.

Di/Kennedy & an MD wrote:

https://www.facebook.com/diana.imig/posts/10228145632048656

“Monday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine.

The press reported that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has now required the vaccine for all teachers and school staff. The Pentagon is proceeding with its mandate for all military service members.

But there are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency’s cynicism.

First, the FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer has “insufficient stocks” of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available, there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine — produced under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) — still available for use.

The FDA decrees that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8 ) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product.

Second, the FDA pointed out that the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine and the existing, EUA Pfizer vaccine are “legally distinct,” but proclaims that their differences do not “impact safety or effectiveness.”

There is a huge real-world difference between products approved under EUA compared with those the FDA has fully licensed.

EUA products are experimental under U.S. law. Both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.

U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.

EUA-approved COVID vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.

The government has created an extremely stingy compensation program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, to redress injuries from all EUA products. The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.

At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say “Comirnaty” on the label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products.

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices places a vaccine on the mandatory schedule, a childhood vaccine benefits from a generous retinue of liability protections.

But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages.

And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical.

Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.

Given this background, the FDA’s acknowledgement in its approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty, but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the “approval” as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates.

The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.

Americans, told that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is now licensed, will understandably assume COVID vaccine mandates are lawful. But only EUA-authorized vaccines, for which no one has any real liability, will be available during the next few weeks when many school mandate deadlines occur.

The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.

While the media has trumpeted that the FDA has approved COVID vaccines, the FDA has not approved the Pfizer BioNTech vaccines, nor any COVID vaccines for the 12- to 15-year age group, nor any booster doses for anyone.

And the FDA has not licensed any Moderna vaccine, nor any vaccine from Johnson & Johnson — so the vast majority, if not all, of vaccines available in the U.S. remain unlicensed EUA products.

Here’s what you need to know when somebody orders you to get the vaccine: Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product.

If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse.

If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen), you have the right to refuse.

The FDA is playing bait and switch with the American public — but we don’t have to play along. If it doesn’t say Comirnaty, you have not been offered an approved vaccine.”

I added this comment to Di’s post:

“The non-transparency (this bait and switch with the branding of the two differently labeled Pfizer products is the latest) …

Paired with plenty of blood clotting reports (particularly concerning is in the brain for me, my mother had her first mini stroke at 39 and clear Alzheimer’s decline by 60 - anything that “might” interfere with brain function - especially by mistake ?? Ummm) …

And the fact that it’s too early to actually offer up “known side effects” which are supposed to be disclosed particularly when in an experimental situation (which we still are)…

The bottom line is, in general, it’s an expectation in the United States that we be presented with products that we as consumers can research and accept or reject at a market-level.

Being able to scrutinize what we’re consuming is part of our culture - it’s very American to have questions and expect answers.

Some seem to have forgotten that this is also how science is supposed to work… peer reviewed articles and sharing of accurate data and the sharing of information/voices from all credible (slippery word these days) sources able to be heard (certainly not silenced 👀)

Having this ability to question puzzle piece taken away (primarily via fear or guilt or peer pressured ‘duty’ for those who decided with the current readily available information) - this has forgotten about a long-standing mantra that we in the US very commonly ascribe to - Caveat Emptor.

“Let the buyer beware.”

We are the consumers here.

The time to ‘buy’ has not arrived for me.

When mandates come along, what that says to me is “hmm, these folks have a marketing problem” and only makes me question the product “for sale” even more.

That natural immunity is not being added in to what’s being measured, to me is the ultimate indicator that what’s being pursued here is not about understanding what’s healthy for the citizens and what isn’t.

I imagine there are warehouses full of the now “swappable” for the ‘approved’ vaccine which is, on top of potentially injuring lots of people … also ineffective for the virus in its current iteration.

It’s even possible that they’re identical- which would suggest there’s some additional shell game level something going on here.

This ‘approval’ is, from what I can see - an attempt to offload that stock - maybe before its expiration date?

Yeah, no thank you.

• Investigation continues.
• Foundation not yet stable.
• Not ready to be the martyr 🙂

I really appreciate all the work you’ve done already and any you may do in the future here Di ❤️”